San Nicolas v. Ayers

Filing 151

ORDER DIRECTING Court Clerk to Return Respondent's Lodged Document 6, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/19/15. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODNEY JESSE SAN NICOLAS, 12 13 14 Case No. 1:06-cv-00942-LJO-SAB Petitioner, DEATH PENALTY CASE v. ORDER DIRECTING COURT CLERK TO RETURN RESPONDENT’S LODGED DOCUMENT 6 KEVIN CHAPPELL, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison, 15 (ECF No. 150) Respondent. 16 17 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Respondent’s notice of filing/lodging state court 20 documents in paper, filed on August 17, 2015. Therein, Respondent purports to lodge 21 “Document 6: Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Filed Conditionally Under Seal; 22 California Supreme Court, case number S028747.” (ECF No. 150 at 2:5-6.) However, the 23 document submitted for filing/lodging as document 6 is not the aforementioned, but rather the 24 California Supreme Court’s decision on Petitioner’s direct appeal, People v. San Nicolas, 34 25 Cal.4th 614 (2004). 26 Even if Respondent had submitted the aforementioned document, filing/lodging under 27 seal requires written order of this Court, following a specific request to seal, making the showing 28 1 1 required by applicable law and submitted in the appropriate manner. Local Rule 141. This is so 2 even if the subject document was sealed in state court. Id. Accordingly, for the reasons stated, it 3 is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 4 The Clerk of the Court is directed to return filed/lodged document 6 to Respondent, and 5 2. 6 Respondent shall comply with the requirements of Local Rule 141 for the sealing of confidential state records. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: August 19, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?