Benyamini v. Manjuano et al

Filing 120

ORDER ADOPTING 97 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 83 Request for Entry of Default Against Defendant Debbie Mandujano signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 09/11/2011. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT BENYAMINI, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. MANJUANO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 1:06-cv-01096-AWI-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 97.) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT DEBBIE MANDUJANO (Doc. 83.) _____________________________/ 17 Robert Benyamini (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On May 24, 2011, Findings and Recommendations were entered, recommending that 21 Plaintiff's request for entry of default, filed on January 5, 2011, be denied. (Doc. 97.) On August 11, 22 2011, Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (Docs. 111, 112.) 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, 24 this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 25 including Plaintiff's objections, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported 26 by the record and proper analysis. 27 28 1 1 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 2 1. 3 24, 2011, are ADOPTED in full; and 4 2. 5 6 The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on May Plaintiff's request for entry of default against Defendant Debbie Mandujano, filed on January 5, 2011, is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: 0m8i78 September 11, 2011 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?