Benyamini v. Manjuano et al
Filing
120
ORDER ADOPTING 97 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 83 Request for Entry of Default Against Defendant Debbie Mandujano signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 09/11/2011. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT BENYAMINI,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
vs.
MANJUANO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
1:06-cv-01096-AWI-GSA-PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. 97.)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S
REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT
AGAINST DEFENDANT DEBBIE
MANDUJANO
(Doc. 83.)
_____________________________/
17
Robert Benyamini (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights
18
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On May 24, 2011, Findings and Recommendations were entered, recommending that
21
Plaintiff's request for entry of default, filed on January 5, 2011, be denied. (Doc. 97.) On August 11,
22
2011, Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (Docs. 111, 112.)
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304,
24
this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,
25
including Plaintiff's objections, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported
26
by the record and proper analysis.
27
28
1
1
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
2
1.
3
24, 2011, are ADOPTED in full; and
4
2.
5
6
The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on May
Plaintiff's request for entry of default against Defendant Debbie Mandujano,
filed on January 5, 2011, is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated:
0m8i78
September 11, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?