Benyamini v. Manjuano et al
Filing
126
ORDER denying 118 Motion to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/22/2011. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT BENYAMINI,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
1:06-cv-01096-AWI-GSA-PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO COMPEL
(Doc. 118.)
v.
DEBBIE MANJUANO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
/
16
17
I.
BACKGROUND
18
Robert Benyamini (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
19
pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the
20
Complaint commencing this action on August 21, 2006. (Doc. 1.) This action now proceeds
21
with the Third Amended Complaint, filed on May 23, 2008, on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment
22
claims for adverse conditions of confinement, against defendants Debbie Mandujano,1 Deputy
23
Wilcox, Deputy Wilkerson, and Deputy O’Grady.2 (Doc. 35.) Plaintiff is presently incarcerated
24
at the Sierra Conservation Center in Jamestown, California.
25
1
26
27
Plaintiff identified this defendant in the Third Amended Complaint as Debbie Manjuano. (Doc. 35.)
However, in the Answer to the complaint, this defendant spelled her name Debbie Mandujano. (Doc. 79.) The
Court uses the defendant’s spelling herein.
2
28
On May 26, 2009, the Court dismissed all other claims and defendants from this action based on Plaintiff’s
failure to state a claim. (Doc. 52.)
1
1
This case is presently in the discovery phase. On September 6, 2011, Plaintiff filed a
2
motion to compel production of documents. (Doc. 118.)
3
II.
4
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
Under Rule 45, any party may serve a subpoena commanding a non-party “to attend and
5
testify; produce designated documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things in
6
that person’s possession, custody, or control; or permit the inspection of premises.” Fed. R. Civ.
7
P. 45(a)(1).
8
9
Plaintiff renews his motion for the Court to compel the Stanislaus County Sheriff’s
Department (“Sheriff’s Department”) to produce copies of grievances he filed.3 Plaintiff seeks
10
copies of “all grievance forms filed [by Plaintiff] from the date of June 2003 through January 22,
11
2004.” (Doc. 118 at 1:5-6.) Plaintiff asserts that he has made more than one request to the
12
Sheriff’s Department for the “information in question,” without success. (Doc. 118 at ¶1)
13
Plaintiff submits as evidence a written response from the Sheriff’s Department dated July 14,
14
2011, stating, “Mr. Benyamini, I have received your request and all files have been purged after
15
three years per policy.” (Exhibit to Doc. 118 at 2.) Plaintiff requests the Court to compel the
16
Sheriff’s Department to “un purge” his case file and produce copies of the documents requested.
17
(Doc. 18 at 1:4-5.)
18
After considering Plaintiff’s evidence, the Court concludes that the Sheriff’s Department
19
cannot produce the documents requested by Plaintiff. In the context of the response received by
20
Plaintiff, “purging of files after three years per policy” would indicate that the files have been
21
disposed of, no longer exist, and therefore cannot be “un-purged.” Thus, if the requested
22
documents are no longer in the Sheriff’s Department’s “possession, custody, or control,” then
23
production cannot be compelled by subpoena. A party, or non-party, cannot be compelled to
24
produce documents that no longer exist. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion to compel shall be denied.
25
26
27
28
3
On August 11, 2011, Plaintiff brought a motion to compel the Stanislaus County Sheriff’s Department to
produce copies of grievance forms, “and any similar documents,” pertaining to Plaintiff, dating from August 15,
2002 to January 22, 2004. (Doc. 109.) On August 22, 2011, the Court issued an order denying the motion to
compel, with leave to submit a written request for issuance of a subpoena, providing pertinent information, within
thirty days. (Doc. 113.)
2
1
2
3
III.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed on
September 6, 2011, is DENIED.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
6i0kij
September 22, 2011
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?