Benyamini v. Manjuano et al
Filing
201
ORDER Vacating Motions for Summary Judgment From Court's Calendar 106 , 152 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/24/12. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT BENYAMINI,
12
13
14
15
16
1:06-cv-01096-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff,
v.
D. MANJUANO, et al.,
ORDER VACATING MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FROM COURT’S CALENDAR
(Docs. 106, 152.)
Defendants.
______________________________/
17
Robert Benyamini (“Plaintiff”) is a proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. Two motions for summary judgment by Defendants are pending in this action, one by
19
Defendant Debbi Mandujano filed on August 8, 2011, and another by Defendants O'Grady, Wilcox, and
20
Wilkerson filed on January 6, 2012. (Docs. 106, 152.)
21
Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit's recent decision in Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 940 (9th Cir.
22
2012), Plaintiff was re-served with the requisite summary judgment notice and has been granted
23
permission to withdraw his oppositions to the motions for summary judgment and submit amended
24
oppositions within thirty days. (Docs. 191, 197, 199, 200.) Defendants have also been granted
25
additional time to reply to Plaintiff's amended oppositions, if any. (Docs. 197, 199.) Accordingly, in
26
light of 28 U.S.C. § 476(a)(1), the Civil Justice Reform Act, Defendants’ motions for summary judgment
27
are HEREBY DEEMED VACATED from the Court’s calendar until the time has expired for Plaintiff
28
1
1
to file amended oppositions and for Defendants to reply, and the motions are deemed submitted pursuant
2
to Local Rule 230(l).
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
6i0kij
August 24, 2012
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?