Ito et al v. Brighton/Shaw, Inc. et al

Filing 302

ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/15/2009. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On November 11, 2009, Defendant and Cross-Complainant ROBERT CARSON ("Carson") and Defendant, Cross-Defendant and Cross-Complainant CRAIG DAVIS and CINDY DAVIS (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Davis"), by and through their respective counsels of record, stipulated that a settlement agreement among them has been reached in the above-captioned action, and that the terms of the settlement are embodied in a separately executed Settlement Release Action. The parties requested the Court dismiss the entire action in its entirety, with prejudice, and each party bearing their own costs and attorneys' fees. NAOKO ITO, TOSHIE ITO, TAKAFUMI ) ITO, MICHIKO MORINAGA and ) KIMIKO MIYOSHI PRICE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) BRIGHTON/SHAW, INC., BRIGHTON ) HILLS, LTD., JOHN E. QUIRING, ) ROBERT CARSON, Individually, ) ROBERT CARSON, as General Partner ) of BRIGHTON HILLS, LTD., CRAIG ) DAVIS and CINDY DAVIS, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) ) AND RELATED CROSS ACTION ) ____________________________________) NO. 1:06-CV-01135-AWI-DLB ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (Document # 301) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Therefore, in light of the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1) 2) This action is dismissed with prejudice, in its entirety; and Each party shall bear its own costs, attorneys' fees and other fees incurred in connection with this action. 3) The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 November 15, 2009 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?