E & N Enterprises, LLC v. Caliche's, Inc. et al
STIPULATION EXTENDING TME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON. Filing due by 9/18/2006. signed by Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/12/06. (Lira, I)
(TAG) E & N Enterprises, LLC v. Caliche's, Inc. et al
Stephen E. Carroll, # 116333 CasMcCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Document 14 e 1:06-cv-01163-AWI-NEW Wayte & Carruth LLP P.O. Box 28912 5 River Park Place East Fresno, CA 93720-1501 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300
( S P A C E BELO W FO R FILIN G STAM P O N L Y )
Page 1 of 2
Attorneys for Defendants CALICHE'S, INC., B. DAVID WORTHAM and DANA WORTHAM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA [FRESNO]
E & N ENTERPRISES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CALICHE'S, INC., a corporation; B. DAVID WORTHAM, and DANA WORTHAM, Defendants.
Case No. 1:06-CV-01163 AWI LJO STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record that the time for Defendants CALICHE'S, INC., B. DAVID WORTHAM and DANA WORTHAM to respond to Plaintiff E & N ENTERPRISES, LLC's Complaint shall be extended to September 18, 2006. Dated: September ____, 2006 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
/ s / Stephen E. Carroll Stephen E. Carroll Attorneys for Defendants CALICHE'S, INC., B. DAVID WORTHAM and DANA WORTHAM
Dated: September ____, 2006 Case 1:06-cv-01163-AWI-NEW Document 14
Filed 09/12/2006 By:
Page 2 of 2
/ s / Donald P. Lescoulie Donald P. Lescoulie Attorney for Plaintiff E & N ENTERPRISES, LLC
ORDER Pursuant to the above-referenced stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants CALICHE'S, INC., B. DAVID WORTHAM and DANA WORTHAM shall have until September 18, 2006 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 12, 2006
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?