Coston-Moore v. Medina et al

Filing 52

ORDER Authorizing Defendants to Subpoena L. Gallow to Appear at Evidentiary Hearing, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/12/12. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 AMBER RENAME COSTON-MOORE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) L. MEDINA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________) Case No. 1:06-cv-01183 RC (PC) ORDER AUTHORIZING DEFENDANTS TO SUBPOENA L. GALLOW TO APPEAR AT EVIDENTIARY HEARING 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 27, 2012, the Court ordered an evidentiary hearing to be held 19 to determine the authenticity of the declarations submitted in opposition to Defendants’ motion for 20 summary judgment. (Doc. 42) 21 After this, on March 28, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiff to provide information to locate her 22 witness, identified only as “L. Gallow.” (Doc. 44) The Court ordered Plaintiff to provide the full, 23 correctly spelled name of “L. Gallow” and her CDCR number or her current address, if she is no longer 24 in custody. Id. 25 On April 10, 2012, Plaintiff reported that L. Gallow’s full name is Lauretta Gallow and that Ms. 26 Gallow is no longer in custody. (Doc. 51 at 1) Plaintiff reports that Ms. Gallow’s former CDCR number 27 was X-11708 but that she now lives at 2318 Church Avenue, in Sacramento, CA with her boyfriend, 28 George Burkett. Id. 1 1 Therefore, Defendants are authorized to issue a subpoena requiring Ms. Gallow to appear at the 2 evidentiary hearing, on April 25, 2012. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: April 12, 2012 9j7khi /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?