Coston-Moore v. Medina et al
Filing
98
ORDER RE: Defendants' 83 Motions in Limine signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 08/07/2013. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
Amber Renaye Coston-Moore,
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01183-RC
9
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN
LIMINE (Doc. 83)
10
v.
11
L. Medina, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
/
15
A telephonic motion in limine hearing was held before the Honorable Raner C. Collins on
16
August 7, 2013. In response to Defendants’ Motion in Limine (Doc. 83), IT IS HEREBY
17
ORDERED as follows:
18
1.
Defendants’ Motion to Preclude Plaintiff from Offering Opinions About the Cause
19
of Her Past and Current Medical Condition is granted. Plaintiff may testify about
20
what happened during the incident, what she felt, and what she experienced, but may
21
not testify as to matters requiring expert medical opinion.
22
2.
Defendants’ Motion to Preclude Plaintiff from Making Any Reference to Irrelevant
23
Individuals or Events That Are Irrelevant to Her Claim for Excessive Force is
24
granted.
25
3.
Defendants’ Motion to Preclude Evidence that Defendants are Parties in Other
26
Lawsuits or Were Involved in Other Incidents Alleging Excessive Force is granted.
27
4.
Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Non-Testifying Inmate Witness Written Statements
28
1
1
2
as Hearsay is granted.
5.
3
4
Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Evidence or Testimony of Offers to Compromise is
granted.
6.
Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Evidence that the State May Pay the Judgment or
5
Reimburse Defendants in the Event a Judgment is Rendered Against Them is
6
granted.
7
7.
Defendants’ Motion to Allow Evidence of Plaintiff’s and Witnesses’ Prior Felony
8
Convictions is granted. Felony convictions that are less than 10 years old may be
9
used for impeachment purposes.
10
DATED this 7th day of August, 2013.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?