Davis v. Ramen et al
Filing
122
ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's Surreply (ECF No. 121 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/16/2011. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JAMES L. DAVIS,
10
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01216-AWI-SMS PC
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S SURREPLY
(ECF No. 121)
RAMEN, et al.,
13
Defendants.
/
14
15
Plaintiff James L. Davis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
16
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Findings and recommendations
17
issued on June 9, 2011, recommending granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. On
18
July 11, 2011, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations, and Defendants filed
19
a reply on July 22,2011. On August 15, 2011, Plaintiff filed a surreply.
20
The Local Rules provide for a motion, an opposition, and a reply. Neither the Local Rules
21
nor the Federal Rules provide the right to file a surreply, and the Court neither requested one nor
22
granted a request on the behalf of Plaintiff to file one. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s surreply, filed August
23
15, 2011, shall be stricken from the record.
24
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s surreply, filed August 15, 2011, is
STRICKEN from the Court’s record.
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
28
Dated:
August 16, 2011
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
1
1
icido3
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?