Davis v. Ramen et al

Filing 122

ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's Surreply (ECF No. 121 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/16/2011. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JAMES L. DAVIS, 10 CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01216-AWI-SMS PC Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S SURREPLY (ECF No. 121) RAMEN, et al., 13 Defendants. / 14 15 Plaintiff James L. Davis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Findings and recommendations 17 issued on June 9, 2011, recommending granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. On 18 July 11, 2011, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations, and Defendants filed 19 a reply on July 22,2011. On August 15, 2011, Plaintiff filed a surreply. 20 The Local Rules provide for a motion, an opposition, and a reply. Neither the Local Rules 21 nor the Federal Rules provide the right to file a surreply, and the Court neither requested one nor 22 granted a request on the behalf of Plaintiff to file one. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s surreply, filed August 23 15, 2011, shall be stricken from the record. 24 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s surreply, filed August 15, 2011, is STRICKEN from the Court’s record. 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 Dated: August 16, 2011 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 1 1 icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?