Davis v. Ramen et al

Filing 77

ORDER ADOPTING 74 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and DENYING 47 Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/22/2010. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff James L. Davis ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 4, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendations which recommended that Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date on which the Findings and Recommendations were served. Neither Plaintiff nor Defendants have filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. /// /// 1 v. RAMEN, et al., Defendants. / O R D E R DENYING MOTION PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Doc. #47 & #74) FOR A JAMES L. DAVIS, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01216-AWI-SKO PC O R D E R ADOPTING RECOMMENDATIONS FINDINGS AND UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. 2. The May 4, 2010 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full; and Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 June 22, 2010 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?