Weaver v. California Correctional Institution Building A-4 A-4 Director et al
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE regarding filing fee Show Cause Response due by 10/30/2006. signed by Judge William M. Wunderlich on 9/22/6. (Kusamura, W)
(PC) Weaver v. California Correctional Institution Building A-4 A-4 Director et al
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action challenging the conditions of his confinement. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the California Department of Corrections at CCI Tehachapi, sets forth vague allegations of conduct by Correctional Officials at Tehachapi. Plaintiff alleges that correctional staff is observing plaintiff's mind with the use of a "mind device" and cameras. The Prison Litigation Reform Act provides that "[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more occasions, while incarcerated or detained in a facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the ground that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious injury." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). THIRD WATCH WARDEN, et al., Defendants. vs. WILLIE WEAVER, Plaintiff, CV F 06 1290 AWI WMW P ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
This plaintiff has, on 3 prior occasions, brought civil actions challenging the conditions of his confinement. All three action were dismissed as frivolous, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Weaver v. Pelican Bay State Prison, No. C 04-3077 JW (PR) (N.D. Cal May 18, 2005); Weaver v. Nimrod, No. C 04-3154 JW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2004); Weaver v. Daniel, No. C 05-1373 JW (PR) (N.D. Cal. May 9, 2005); Weaver v. Pelican Bay State Prison Mail Room, No. C 04-4784 JW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2005); Weaver v. Montiero, et al., No. 05-0166 RSWL (FMO) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2005). Plaintiff is therefore not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis unless he alleges facts indicating that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. There are no such facts alleged in this case. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is directed to show cause, within thirty days of the date of service of this order, why he should not be directed to submit the $350 filing fee in full. Failure to file a response will result in an order directing Plaintiff to submit the $350 filing fee in full.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 22, 2006 mmkd34 /s/ William M. Wunderlich UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?