Janoiko v. Cox

Filing 39

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/10/2009 requiring Plaintiff to file opposition or statement of non-opposition to 36 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (Filing Deadline: 1/11/2010.)(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On September 22, 2009, Defendant Cox filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 36.) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 78-230(m). Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff must file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant's motion for summary judgment. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action will be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to obey the Court's order and failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 220hhe v. SCOTT COX, Defendant. / ROBERT C. JANOIKO, Plaintiff, 1:06-cv-01405-OWW-GSA-PC ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS (Doc. 36) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA December 10, 2009 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?