Rotroff v. Robinson et al

Filing 49

ORDER Requiring Parties To Notify Court Whether A Settlement Conference Would Be Beneficial, Thirty-Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/2/2009. (Case Management Deadline: 9/9/2009) (Scrivner, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 / 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Plaintiff Denis K. Rotroff ("Plaintiff") is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against defendants McClain, Robinson, Dieke, Rabout, Roger and Mendoza ("Defendants") and is scheduled for trial commencing December 7, 2009. Within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff and Defendants are each to file a written response indicating whether a court settlement conference would be beneficial in resolving this action. If both parties agree, the Court will issue a further scheduling order setting this matter for settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge or District Judge from the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a v. JIM ROBINSON, et al., Defendants. DENIS K. ROTROFF, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01419-LJO DLB PC ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO NOTIFY COURT WHETHER A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT August 2, 2009 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?