Marquez v. Mendoza-Powers
ORDER ADOPTING in FULL the FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 10 ; ORDER DENYING Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Enter Judgment, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/30/09: Petition is DENIED with prejudice. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
U . S . D i s t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia Jp
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MARIO MARQUEZ, Petitioner,
K. MENDOZA-POWERS, Respondent.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1:06-CV-1423 LJO JMD HC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION [Doc. #10] ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation on November 24, 2008, that recommended the petition be DENIED with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge further recommended that the Clerk of Court be DIRECTED to enter judgment. The Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. On December 29, 2008, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file and having considered the objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis, and there is no need to modify the Findings and Recommendation based 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
U . S . D i s t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia
on the points raised in the objections. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendation issued November 24, 2008, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice; 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment; and
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 January 30, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?