Hardaway v. Superior Court et al

Filing 5

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:06-cv-2259 FCD DAD PC) to Fresno (1:06-cv-1460 AWI WMW PC); signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/18/06. (Kirkpatrick, S)

Download PDF
(PC) Hardaway v. Superior Court et al Doc. 5 Case 1:06-cv-01460-LJO-WMW Document 5 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. SUPERIOR COURT, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff has not paid the required filing fee or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by two defendants. The alleged violations took place in Kings County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 3-120(d). A civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of this court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. See Local Rule 3-120(f). This action will therefore be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. ///// ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SONNY RAY HARDAWAY, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2259 FCD DAD P ORDER Case 1:06-cv-01460-LJO-WMW Document 5 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DAD:13:bb hard2259.22 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and 2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number to be assigned to this case and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 DATED: October 18, 2006. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?