Williams et al v. Woodford et al

Filing 104

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/26/2011. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS,

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01535-SMS PC

10
Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV.
PROC. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

11
v.
12
JEANNE WOODFORD,

(ECF No. 103)

13
Defendants.
14

/

15
Plaintiff John Wesley Williams (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
16
forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on
17
the first amended complaint, filed April 21, 2008, against Defendant T. Vasquez for violation of the
18
First Amendment. Defendant Vasquez filed an answer on December 3, 2009. On July 13, 2011, the
19
parties submitted a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice.
20
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) “the plaintiff may dismiss an
21
action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have
22
appeared.” The dismissal is without prejudice unless the stipulation states otherwise. Fed. R. Civ.
23
Proc. 41(a)(1)(B). The stipulation is signed by the parties and states the dismissal is with prejudice.
24
Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), it is HEREBY
25
ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, and all pending motions are terminated.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28

Dated:
icido3

July 26, 2011

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1