Williams et al v. Woodford et al

Filing 91

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/16/2011 addressing inmate communication re 89 Order; 90 Response.(Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS,

10

Plaintiff,

11

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01535-SMS PC
ORDER ADDRESSING
COMMUNICATION

INMATE

v.
(ECF Nos. 89, 90)

12

JEANNE WOODFORD,

13

Defendants.
/

14
15

Plaintiff John Wesley Williams (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

16

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 28, 2011, an order

17

was issued ordering Plaintiff to provide the name and inmate number or date of birth of each inmate

18

he believes has personal knowledge of facts relating to the this action in order for the Court to

19

facilitate the communication between inmates. On April 8, 2011, Plaintiff filed a response providing

20

the names of three inmates. Plaintiff did not provide a date of birth or inmate number for F.

21

Williams and, without this information, the Court is unable to provide assistance in facilitating

22

communication with the inmate. A letter will be issued requesting the institutions grant permission

23

for communication between Plaintiff and potential witnesses J. Crosby and T. Gleason.1

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated:

April 16, 2011

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder

27
1

28

Plaintiff identifies T. Gleason as an inmate, however according to the California Department of Corrections
and Rehabilitation inmate locator he has been paroled and is not currently incarcerated.

1

1

icido3

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2