City of Fresno v. Boeing Company, et al.

Filing 326

ORDER on Boeing Company's Motion for Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, Summary Adjudication of Plaintiff's RCRA Cause of Action, Signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/2/2010. (Arellano, S.)

City of Fresno v. Boeing Company, et al.

Doc. 326

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

FRANCIS M. GOLDSBERRY II, SBN: 63737 FRANCIS M. GOLDSBERRY III, SBN: 178739 GOLDSBERRY, FREEMAN & GUZMAN, LLP 777 12th Street, Suite 250 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant THE BOEING COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE CITY OF FRESNO,

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED ) STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; ) NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU; THE ) BOEING COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ )

No.: 1:06-CV-01559-OWW-GSA ORDER ON BOEING COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF PLAINTIFF'S RCRA CAUSE OF ACTION

On June 14, 2010, the Boeing Company's ("Boeing") Motion for Summary Judgement, or, Alternatively, Summary Adjudication of Plaintiff's RCRA Cause of Action was heard by the Court. Lisa A. Decker, Jessica E. Yates, and Jeffrey L. Willis appeared for plaintiff the City of Fresno (the "City"). Francis M. Goldsberry II and Francis M. Goldsberry III appeared for Boeing. After considering all papers filed in connection with Boeing's motion and after hearing oral argument, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: 1. Boeing's motion for summary judgment of plaintiff's RCRA cause of action is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in this Court's Memorandum Decision dated June 30, 2010 (Docket No. 322). Plaintiff's claim against Boeing under RCRA, as alleged in the Fourth Claim for Relief of the Second Amended Complaint, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
ORDER ON BOEING'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION RE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CASE NO.: 1:06-CV-01559-OWW-GSA

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 2, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ON BOEING'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION RE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CASE NO.: 1:06-CV-01559-OWW-GSA

-2-