United States of America v. Uptergrove et al
Filing
195
ORDER granting motion to substitute party signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/30/11. (Nazaroff, H)
ERIC D. HOUSER #130079
JEFFREY S. ALLISON, #173620
HOUSER & ALLISON
A Professional Corporation
9970 Research Drive
Irvine, CA 92618
(949) 679-1111
(949) 679-1112 fax
Attorneys for limited purpose for Defendant, BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC.
DBA HOMEQ SERVICING, erroneously named herein as HOMEQ SERVICING, INC.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CHARLES WAYNE UPTERGROVE,
ET AL.
_____________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO: 1:06-CV-1630-AWI-WMW
HON. ANTHONY W. ISHII
ORDER GRANTING MOTION AND
SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY
The Motion of Defendant BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC. DBA HOMEQ
SERVICING, erroneously named herein as HOMEQ SERVICING, INC. (“HomEq”) to
Substitute Party Pursuant to Order of August 23, 2011, filed and served on September 21, 2011
with oral argument waived, came on regularly for hearing on November 28, 2011, appearances
as noted on the record. There was no opposition to the Motion. Defendant CALIFORNIA
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT filed a Statement of Non-Opposition on
September 22, 2011. Plaintiff filed a Statement of Non-Opposition on November 10, 2011. No
other parties filed any response.
The Court having considered the Motion, Statements, matters of which judicial notice
was requested and/or appropriate, its own files, and with good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that HomEq’s Motion is GRANTED. WELLS FARGO
HOME MORTGAGE CORP. c/o Quality Loan Service Corp. is substituted for Defendant
HomEq in this action. HomEq is discharged from any further obligation, participation or
involvement in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 30, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
0m8i788
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?