United States of America v. Uptergrove et al

Filing 195

ORDER granting motion to substitute party signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/30/11. (Nazaroff, H)

Download PDF
ERIC D. HOUSER #130079 JEFFREY S. ALLISON, #173620 HOUSER & ALLISON A Professional Corporation 9970 Research Drive Irvine, CA 92618 (949) 679-1111 (949) 679-1112 fax Attorneys for limited purpose for Defendant, BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC. DBA HOMEQ SERVICING, erroneously named herein as HOMEQ SERVICING, INC. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiffs, vs. CHARLES WAYNE UPTERGROVE, ET AL. _____________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO: 1:06-CV-1630-AWI-WMW HON. ANTHONY W. ISHII ORDER GRANTING MOTION AND SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY The Motion of Defendant BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC. DBA HOMEQ SERVICING, erroneously named herein as HOMEQ SERVICING, INC. (“HomEq”) to Substitute Party Pursuant to Order of August 23, 2011, filed and served on September 21, 2011 with oral argument waived, came on regularly for hearing on November 28, 2011, appearances as noted on the record. There was no opposition to the Motion. Defendant CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT filed a Statement of Non-Opposition on September 22, 2011. Plaintiff filed a Statement of Non-Opposition on November 10, 2011. No other parties filed any response. The Court having considered the Motion, Statements, matters of which judicial notice was requested and/or appropriate, its own files, and with good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that HomEq’s Motion is GRANTED. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE CORP. c/o Quality Loan Service Corp. is substituted for Defendant HomEq in this action. HomEq is discharged from any further obligation, participation or involvement in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 30, 2011 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 0m8i788

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?