K'napp v. Adams et al
Filing
157
ORDER Vacating Hearing on Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment from Court's Calendar, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/21/15. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K’NAPP,
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
vs.
D. G. ADAMS, et al.,
10
1:06-cv-01701-LJO-GSA-PC
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON
MOTION and Motion FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT FROM COURT’S
CALENDAR
(ECF No. 136.)
Defendants.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Eric Charles Rodney K’napp (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this
civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 22, 2014, Defendants filed a
motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 136.) On September 1, 2015, the court entered
findings and recommendations to grant the motion, and the parties were allowed twenty days in
which to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 154.) On September
16, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for a thirty-day extension of time in which to file objections.
(ECF No. 155.) On, September 18, 2015, Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time was
granted. (ECF No. 156.) In light of 28 U.S.C. § 476(a)(1), the Civil Justice Reform Act, the
hearing on the motion and the motion itself for summary judgment is HEREBY DEEMED
VACATED from the court’s calendar until such time as Plaintiff files his objections and
Defendants are allowed ten days in which to respond to the objections.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated:
September 21, 2015
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?