Holt v. Scribner, et al.
ORDER, signed by District Judge David C. Bury on 8/28/09: Plaintiff's Motion to File Third Amended Complaint 32 is GRANTED and DENIED IN PART; The lodged Third Amended Complaint shall be stricken from the record; DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS and USM-285 Forms. Service is appropriate for MTA/Nurse A. Chacone. Clerk to send plaintiff: (1) Summons, (1) USM-285 Forms, and (1) copy of the Second Amended Complaint filed on 2/20/09. (Notice of Submission of Documents ddl 9/30/2009) (Hellings, J)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 T h is Court's previous Order (Doc. No. 28 at 7 ¶¶3-25) allowed Plaintiff to amend and su b stitu te a Doe Defendant with a named individual, which is the primary gist of the recently lo d g e d Third Amended Complaint. This Court will allow that substitution and order service o f process on that Defendant. There is no need for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint to d elete and renumber claims that have already been dismissed by this Court's previous Order; it is a duplicative and unnecessarily time-consuming request to rectify a problem that does n o t exist. A c c o r d i n g l y, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to File Third Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 3 2 ) is granted in part and denied in part. The Motion is granted in that Doe Defendant #1 is n o w substituted and named as Defendant MTA/Nurse A. Chacone, nunc pro tunc. The M o tio n is denied, in the interest of judicial economy, as an unnecessary duplication of this C o u rt's previous Order dismissing claims and counts, such that the lodged Third Amended vs. A . K. Scribner, et al., Defendants. Virgil E. Holt, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV-1-06-1719-DCB P ORDER I N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
C o m p la in t shall be stricken from the record. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant MTA/Nurse A. Chacone must answer C o u n ts One, Four, Six, Nine, Ten, Eleven, and Fourteen of the Second Amended Complaint. T h e Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Second Amended C o m p la in t (Doc. No. 27), this Order, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an in s tru c tio n sheet, and copies of summons and USM-285 forms for Defendant Chacone. W ith in 30 days of the date of filing of this Order, Plaintiff must complete and return to the C le rk of Court the Notice of Submission of Documents. Plaintiff must submit with the Notice o f Submission of Documents: a copy of the Second Amended Complaint for each Defendant, a copy of this Order for each Defendant, a completed summons for each Defendant, and a c o m p lete d USM-285 for each Defendant. Plaintiff must not attempt service on Defendants a n d must not request waiver of service. Once the Clerk of Court has received the Notice of S u b m is s io n of Documents and the required documents, the Court will direct the United S ta te s Marshal to seek waiver of service from each Defendant or serve each Defendant. If P la in t iff fails to return the Notice of Submission of Documents and the required d o cu m en ts within 30 days of the date of filing of this Order, the Clerk of Court must, w ith o u t further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice. S e e Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). D A T E D this 28 th day of August, 2009.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?