Contreraz v. Stockbridge et al

Filing 71

ORDER DENYING 69 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time and DIRECTING Clerk's Office to Re-Serve Orders 67 and 68 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/11/2011. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

MICHAEL CONTRERAZ,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01817-LJO-SKO PC
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME AND DIRECTING
CLERK’S OFFICE TO RE-SERVE ORDERS

v.
J. STOCKBRIDGE, et al.,

13

(Docs. 67-69)

Defendants.
/

14
15

On July 8, 2011, Plaintiff Michael Contreraz, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

16

pauperis, filed a motion seeking an extension of time and a notice of change of address. At this

17

juncture, there is nothing required of Plaintiff and his motion for an extension of time is HEREBY

18

DENIED as premature.

19
20

In light of Plaintiff’s address change, the Clerk’s Office shall re-serve court orders 67 and
68.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

Dated:
i0d3h8

July 11, 2011

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
1