Richardson et al v. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal et al
Filing
3
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO JUDGE NAUGLE; Plaintiffs' opposition due by 12/26/2006; signed by Judge Barry T. Moskowitz on 12/29/2006. (Hutcheson, C)
<![CDATA[
Richardson et al v. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal et al
Doc. 3
Case 1:06-cv-01852-BTM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: December 21, 2006
Document 3
Filed 12/22/2006
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAMMYE A RICHARDSON, MICHAEL A RICHARDSON, ET AL., vs. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 1:06cv1852 BTM ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO JUDGE NAUGLE
NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL, ET AL., Defendants. Judge Moskowitz has been designated to decide the pending motion to dismiss as to defendant Judge David N. Naugle. If Plaintiffs have not yet filed their opposition to the motion to dismiss, they must do so by 4:00 p.m. on December 26, 2006. Any reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on December 29, 2006. The Clerk shall give telephonic notice of the contents of this order to Plaintiffs. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Hon. Barry Ted Moskowitz United States District Judge
1
1:06cv01852 BTM
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
