Wade Bush v. James Yates, Et Al.

Filing 39

**DISCHARGED PER 41 ORDER**ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to Obey a 38 Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/2/2009. Show Cause Response due by 8/4/2009. (Sondheim, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 This is a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Plaintiff Wade Bush, a state 16 prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On April 10, 2009, the Court issued an order 17 authorizing service of Plaintiff's second amended complaint, and requiring Plaintiff to fill out and 18 return the enclosed summonses and USM-285 forms, within thirty days. More than thirty days have 19 passed, and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. 20 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. 22 cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey the Court's order; 23 and 24 2. 25 to prosecute. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: i0d3h8 July 2, 2009 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 The failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action for failure Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show v. JAMES A. YATES, et al., (Doc. 38) Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE / WADE BUSH, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01904-AWI-SMS PC ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?