Provencio, et al. v. Vasquez, et al.

Filing 198

ORDER re 195 and 197 AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/14/2010. (Leon-Guerrero, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EDMUND G. BROWN JR., State Bar No. 37100 Attorney General of California PAMELA J. HOLMES, State Bar No. 147360 Supervising Deputy Attorney General DOUG KNOLL, State Bar No. 077040 Deputy Attorney General BENJAMIN BARNOUW, State Bar No. 168581 Deputy Attorney General 300 South Spring Street, Suite 1702 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Telephone: (213) 897-6404 Fax: (213) 897-9395 Attorneys for Defendants Pat L. Vazquez, Matthew Palmer, David Hicks, Lorlean Drugich, Remijio Paredes, and Michael Songer IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION DANIEL PROVENCIO, JR., personally and 1:07-CV-00069-AWI-JLT as successor in interest to DANIEL PROVENCIO, deceased, by his guardian ad JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED litem, Maria Lucero, et al., ORDER RESCHEDULING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATE Plaintiffs, Courtroom: No. 2 v. Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii Trial Date: August 17, 2010 PATRICIA L. VAZQUEZ, et al., Defendants. 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RESCHEDULING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATE (Provencio v. Vazquez, et al.) (1:07-CV-00069-AWI-JLT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS: (1) Trial is currently scheduled to begin on August 17, 2010; (2) The Pretrial Conference is scheduled for June 18, 2010; (3) All Defendants have filed motions for summary judgment; (4) On May 13, 2010, U.S. District Court Judge Anthony W. Ishii referred the motions for summary judgment to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 for the entry for Findings and Recommendations; (5) On June 9, 2010, a hearing was held on defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment before Magistrate Judge Thurston, and Magistrate Judge Thurston took the motions under submission; (6) Pursuant to U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California Local Rule 304(b) and (d), and 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B), any party who wishes to object to the Findings and Recommendations to be issued by Magistrate Judge Thurston concerning defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment may file an Objection within fourteen (14) days of being served with the Findings and Recommendations, and any party who wishes to respond to an Objection may do so with fourteen (14) days of being served with an Objection; (7) Given the foregoing circumstances, the parties have been unable to meaningfully prepare for trial in the absence of rulings on the pending motions for summary judgment, and are unable to prepare and file Joint Pretrial Statement by the current deadline of June 11, 2010; and (8) The parties have met and conferred, through their respective counsel, and have determined that, in light of the above circumstances, the case will be unable to proceed to trial as presently scheduled. /// /// /// /// /// 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RESCHEDULING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATE (Provencio v. Vazquez, et al.) (1:07-CV-00069-AWI-JLT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// Now, therefore, the parties stipulate as follows, subject to approval by the Court: (1) The Pretrial Conference, currently set for June 18, 2010, may be vacated, to be reset for August 17, 2010; and (2) The Trial date, currently set for August 17, 2010, may be vacated, to be reset for October 26, 2010. Dated: June 10, 2010 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California PAMELA J. HOLMES Supervising Deputy Attorney General DOUG KNOLL Deputy Attorney General _______/s/ Benjamin Barnouw_____ BENJAMIN BARNOUW Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Pat L. Vazquez, Matthew Palmer, David Hicks, Lorlean Drugich, Remijio Paredes, and Michael Songer Dated: June 11, 2010 MICHAEL R. MITCHELL, ESQ. _____/s/_Michael R. Mitchell______ MICHAEL R. MITCHELL, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff Daniel Provencio, Jr. Dated: June 11, 2010 MCNICHOLAS & MCNICHOLAS _____/s/_John P. McNicholas_______ JOHN P. MCNICHOLAS, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff Nancy Mendoza 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RESCHEDULING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATE (Provencio v. Vazquez, et al.) (1:07-CV-00069-AWI-JLT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 10, 2010 GORDON, EDELSTEIN, KREPACK, GRANT, FELTON & GOLDSTEIN _____/s/_Joshua M. Merliss_______ JOSHUA M. MERLISS, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff Johnny G. Provencio Dated: June 11, 2010 LEBEAU-THELEN, LLP _____/s/_ J. Nile Kinney_________ J. NILE KINNEY, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant Matthew Adams 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RESCHEDULING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATE (Provencio v. Vazquez, et al.) (1:07-CV-00069-AWI-JLT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DEAC_Signature-END: DEAC_Signature-END: ORDER The Court has read and considered the stipulation of the parties and, good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) The June 18, 2010 Pretrial Conference is VACATED, and is re-set for August 17, 2010, at 8:30 a.m., before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii, United States District Judge, in Courtroom 2, United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721; and (2) The August 17, 2010 trial date is VACATED, and is re-set for October 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m., before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii, United States District Judge, in Courtroom 2, United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721. 9j7khijed IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 14, 2010 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9j7khijed 5 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RESCHEDULING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATE (Provencio v. Vazquez, et al.) (1:07-CV-00069-AWI-JLT)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?