Edward Juliano Mullins v. Wenciker et al

Filing 173

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Stay as MOOT 156 ; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Deposition Transcripts 164 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/2/11. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 EDWARD JULIANO MULLINS, 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 CASE NO. 1:07-CV-00108-LJO-DLB PC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY AS MOOT (DOC. 156) v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS (DOC. 164) WENCIKER, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 / 15 16 Plaintiff Edward J. Mullins (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in 17 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendant 18 R. Wenciker. Pending before the Court are 1) Plaintiff’s motion to stay the proceedings, filed 19 October 18, 2010 and 2) Plaintiff’s motion for transcript of deposition, filed January 12, 2011. 20 I. 21 Motion To Stay Plaintiff moved the Court for a stay of the proceedings until the Court adjudicated 22 Plaintiff’s motions for an extension of time, appointment of counsel, and return of his legal 23 property. Plaintiff’s other motions have all been resolved. See Findings and Recommendations 24 (“F&R”), filed Dec. 16, 2010, Doc. 163; Order Adopting F&R, filed Jan. 28, 2011, Doc. 166 25 (resolving Plaintiff’s motion for return of legal property); Order, filed Oct. 26, 2010, Doc. 160 26 (resolving motion for appointment of counsel); Order, filed Oct. 13, 2010, Doc. 152 (resolving 27 motion for extension of time). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for a stay, filed October 18, 2010, 28 is denied as moot. 1 1 II. Motion For Deposition Transcript 2 Plaintiff moves for a copy of a transcript of Plaintiff’s deposition. Plaintiff requests the 3 transcript pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(e). The deposition was conducted at 4 California State Prison - Los Angeles County. 5 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(e)(1), 6 8 [o]n request by the deponent . . ., the deponent must be allowed thirty days after being notified by the officer that the transcript or recording is available in which: (A) to review the transcript or recording; and (B) if there are changes in form or substance, to sign a statement listing the changes and the reasons for making them. 9 Once the court reporter has notified Plaintiff that the transcript is available, Plaintiff is 10 granted thirty days in which to review the transcript and provide any changes. A court order is 11 not required. 7 12 Plaintiff is not entitled to a copy of the deposition transcript for free, even if he is 13 proceeding in forma pauperis. See id. 30(f)(3) (requiring the officer who recorded transcript to 14 furnish a copy to deponent “[w]hen paid reasonable charges”); Tedder v. Odel, 890 F.2d 210, 15 211-12 (9th Cir. 1989) (per curiam) (citations omitted) (finding that expenditure of public funds 16 on behalf of indigent litigant is proper only when authorized by Congress). Accordingly, it is 17 HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for a copy of the deposition transcript without 18 payment is denied. 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 2, 2011 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?