Carpenter v. Sullivan, et al.

Filing 205

ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/18/13. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 12/19/2013 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIE LEE CARPENTER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. W.J. SULLIVAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Willie Lee Carpenter is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 18 ) Case No.: 1:07-cv-00114-SAB (PC) ) ) ) ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ) ) ) ) ) ) action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Following resolution of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, this action is proceeding 19 20 against Defendants Litton, Gonzales, and Pfeil for excessive force in violation of the Eighth 21 Amendment and against Defendants Barajas, Ortiz, Salazar, and Martinez, for failure to protect 22 Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On December 17, 2013, the District Court Judge assigned this action to the undersigned 23 24 following the parties’ consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 204.) This action is now 25 ready to be set for trial. In the interest of accommodating the parties’ schedules, the Court will hold a 26 telephonic hearing for scheduling purposes. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. 4 A telephonic scheduling hearing will be held on December 19, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 9 before the undersigned; 5 2. Counsel for Defendants is directed to arrange for telephone contact with Plaintiff; and 6 3. Counsel for Defendants is directed to contact Courtroom Deputy, Mamie Hernandez, at 7 (559) 499-5672, prior to the hearing date, to receive instructions regarding the conference call. 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 18, 2013 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?