Carpenter v. Sullivan, et al.
Filing
205
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/18/13. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 12/19/2013 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILLIE LEE CARPENTER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
W.J. SULLIVAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff Willie Lee Carpenter is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
17
18
) Case No.: 1:07-cv-00114-SAB (PC)
)
)
) ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
)
)
)
)
)
)
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Following resolution of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, this action is proceeding
19
20
against Defendants Litton, Gonzales, and Pfeil for excessive force in violation of the Eighth
21
Amendment and against Defendants Barajas, Ortiz, Salazar, and Martinez, for failure to protect
22
Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
On December 17, 2013, the District Court Judge assigned this action to the undersigned
23
24
following the parties’ consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 204.) This action is now
25
ready to be set for trial. In the interest of accommodating the parties’ schedules, the Court will hold a
26
telephonic hearing for scheduling purposes.
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly,
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1.
4
A telephonic scheduling hearing will be held on December 19, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., in
Courtroom 9 before the undersigned;
5
2.
Counsel for Defendants is directed to arrange for telephone contact with Plaintiff; and
6
3.
Counsel for Defendants is directed to contact Courtroom Deputy, Mamie Hernandez, at
7
(559) 499-5672, prior to the hearing date, to receive instructions regarding the conference call.
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 18, 2013
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?