Sanchez v. Stancliff, et al.

Filing 63

ORDER STRIKING 60 Notice; ORDER GRANTING 61 MOTION for Thirty-Day EXTENSION of Time to File Response to 55 Order to Show Cause, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 1/23/2009. Show Cause Response due by 2/26/2009. (Sondheim, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 / 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Anthony Joseph Sanchez ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 5, 2009, Plaintiff filed a document entitled "Plaintiff's Notice of Specific Dates of Events and Other Previously Unknown Information." The information set forth in the notice was apparently obtained by Plaintiff through discovery. Plaintiff may not simply add facts or evidence to the record piecemeal. Plaintiff cites no legal authority in support of the submission and the notice is not a legally recognizable filing. Therefore, the notice is HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from the record. On January 20, 2009, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking a second extension of time to file a response to the Court's order directing him to show cause why Defendant Lindini should not be dismissed from this action for failure to provide information sufficient for the United States Marshal to effect service of process. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Plaintiff's motion is HEREBY ORDERED /// /// 1 v. STANCLIFF, et al., Defendants. ANTHONY JOSEPH SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00128-LJO-SMS PC ORDER STRIKING NOTICE (Doc. 60) ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR THIRTYDAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Doc. 61)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

GRANTED and Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order within which to file a response to the order to show cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 January 23, 2009 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2