Sanchez v. Stancliff, et al.

Filing 96

ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's Untimely 95 Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/21/2009. (Jessen, A)

1 2 3 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The Objection is dated September 10, 2009. (Doc. 95, court record p. 5.) Therefore, it is untimely even w i th the application of the prison mailbox rule. Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103, 1107-08 (9th Cir. 2009).
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ANTHONY JOSEPH SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, v. STANCLIFF, et al., Defendants. /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00128-LJO-SMS PC ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S UNTIMELY OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 95)

On September 17, 2009, Plaintiff filed an Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations, filed on August 14, 2009. The parties were given fifteen days within which to object, making Objections due on or before September 3, 2009. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). No timely Objections were filed, and the undersigned adopted the Findings and Recommendations in full and granted Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on September 14, 2009. This action is closed and judgment was entered on September 14, 2009. Plaintiff's Objection is untimely and is HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from the record.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 September 21, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1