Palmer v. Crotty, et al.

Filing 41

ORDER re 39 Discovery and Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/8/2009. Defendant Crotty has not yet filed an answer to the amended complaint. The parties are advised that the deadlines set forth in the Discovery and Scheduling Order filed September 4, 2009 apply only to defendant Tate. (Figueroa, O)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 vs. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN M. PALMER, Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00148 LJO DLB PC ORDER

CROTTY, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff Steven M. Palmer("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Crotty has not yet filed an answer to the amended complaint.1 The parties are advised that the deadlines set forth in the Discovery and Scheduling Order filed September 4, 2009 apply only to defendant Tate.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a

September 8, 2009

/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant Crotty filed a motion to dismiss on May 26, 2009. (Doc. 34.)

1