Sierra v. Woodford, et al.
Filing
90
ORDER Dismissing Action, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/6/11. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
KENNETH ALAN SIERRA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
J. WOODFORD, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
NO. 1:07-cv-00149 LJO GSA PC
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was
18
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule
19
302.
20
On April 23, 2010, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that
21
Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status be revoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and Plaintiff be
22
directed to submit the filing fee in full. Plaintiff requested five extensions of time. On April 14,
23
2011, the Magistrate Judge entered an order granting Plaintiff a final extension of time in which
24
to file objections. Plaintiff was cautioned that no further extensions of time would be granted.
25
On May 27, 2011, the findings and recommendations were adopted in full, and Plaintiff’s in
26
forma pauperis status was revoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff was directed to
27
submit, within thirty days, the $350.00 filing fee for this action. Plaintiff was specifically
28
cautioned that his failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action. Plaintiff has failed to
1
submit the filing fee, or any other response to the May 27, 2011, order.
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed pursuant to Local
3
Rule 11-110 for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and to obey a court order. The Clerk is directed to
4
close this case.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
b9ed48
July 6, 2011
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?