Derwin Jules Jackson v. W. Sullivan, Et Al.

Filing 152

ORDER Requiring Defendants to File a Response to Plaintiff's Letter 15 ,signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/3/19. (Case Management Deadline: 6/21/2019) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DERWIN JULES JACKSON, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 v. W. SULLIVAN, et al., Defendants. 16 1:07-cv-00178-DAD-GSA-PC ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S LETTER (ECF No. 151.) RESPONSE DUE ON OR BEFORE JUNE 21, 2019 17 18 Derwin Jules Jackson (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 8, 2018, a settlement conference was held at 20 the court before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean, and this case settled under the terms and 21 conditions as read into the record. (ECF No. 128.) The court retained jurisdiction for purposes 22 of enforcing the settlement. (Id.) 23 On May 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed a letter addressed to Judge Grosjean in which Plaintiff 24 reported that he has not received any payment from the California Department of Corrections 25 and Rehabilitation pursuant to the settlement agreement. Plaintiff is presently detained at the 26 West Valley Detention Center in Rancho Cucamonga, California. 27 28 The court will therefore require Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff’s letter addressing Plaintiff’s assertion that he has not been paid. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before June 21, 2019, Defendants 2 shall file a written response to Plaintiff’s letter filed on May 23, 2019, addressing Plaintiff’s 3 assertion that he has not been paid pursuant to the settlement agreement. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 3, 2019 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?