Davis v. Merced County, et. al.

Filing 100

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO RELEASE FUNDS DEPOSITED INTO CEDRIC DAVIS, JR.'S BLOCKED ACCOUNT, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/26/2019. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KEIDRON DAVIS, et al., 10 Plaintiffs, 11 12 v. MERCED COUNTY JAIL, et al., Case No. 1:07-cv-00180-SKO ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO RELEASE FUNDS DEPOSITED INTO CEDRIC DAVIS, JR.’S BLOCKED ACCOUNT (Doc. 98) 13 14 Defendants. _____________________________________/ 15 16 17 On July 2, 2019, Plaintiff Cedric Davis, Jr. moved this Court for an Order directing Chase 18 Bank located in Yuba City, California, to release funds which had been deposited in 2008 into an 19 account in said Bank for the benefit of the then-minor Cedric Davis, Jr. (Doc. 98.) 20 The Court ordered that objections, if any, to the requested relief be filed by July 17, 2019, 21 and that, absent same, the requested relief would be granted. (Doc. 99.) No objections were 22 received. 23 The Court being satisfied that it was the intention of the Court and parties that the funds so 24 deposited, and all interest accumulated thereon, be released to Cedric Davis, Jr. upon his reaching 25 the age of majority, and it appearing, further, that Cedric Davis, Jr. has reached the age of majority, 26 the request shall be granted. 27 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the sum of Five Thousand 28 One Hundred Fifty-Two Dollars and Ninety Cents ($5,152.90), plus all interest accrued thereon 1 since deposit, in the Blocked Minor’s Account of Cedric Davis, Jr. at Chase Bank located in Yuba 2 City, California, be forthwith released to said CEDRIC DAVIS, JR. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 July 26, 2019 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?