McCoy v. Spidle et al
Filing
298
SETTLEMENT ORDER, signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 5/23/12. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
Davon E. McCoy,
Plaintiff,
10
11
vs.
12
R. Spidle, et al.,
13
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-07-198-SMM
SETTLEMENT ORDER
14
15
Plaintiff is a state prisoner in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983.
16
On May 18, 2012, the parties held a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Michael
17
J. Seng. (Doc. 290.) On May 21, 2012, this Court held a telephonic status conference
18
regarding those settlement discussions. (Doc. 291.) At the status conference, counsel for the
19
parties advised the Court that a settlement had been reached, and the parties are now in the
20
process of finalizing settlement documents.
21
Accordingly, the magistrate judge reference is withdrawn, and,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED vacating all pending dates in this matter including the
23
trial date set for June 4, 2012, in Sacramento, California.
24
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the parties shall as soon as practicable
25
complete and finalize the necessary settlement documents once all necessary actions have
26
been undertaken by the parties pursuant to the settlement agreement.
27
28
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the parties shall as soon as practicable
file a stipulated request for dismissal of this action.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED acknowledging the professionalism and decorum in
2
which counsel conducted the litigation of this case. The Court commends both counsel for
3
the professional courtesy that they extended to one another during this litigation. The Court
4
expresses its deep satisfaction and appreciation for the enduring principle followed by
5
counsel that litigation courtesies do not disadvantage your litigation position but foster
6
professionalism amongst colleagues striving to best represent their clients. The Court
7
sincerely thanks both counsel.
8
DATED this 23rd day of May, 2012.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?