McCoy v. Spidle et al
Filing
91
ORDER signed by District Judge David C. Bury on 1/8/2009, GRANTING Defendants' 89 MOTION for EXTENSION of TIME to File Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses. (Opposition due by 1/22/2009). (Jessen, A)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 DAVON E. MCCOY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 R. SPIDLE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On January 2, 2009, Defendants filed a motion for extension of time to file their opposition ORDER Case No. 1:07-cv-00198-DCB IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
18 to Plaintiff's motion to compel further discovery responses. For good cause shown, Defendants 19 motion for an extension of time (document 89) is GRANTED to January 22, 2009. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DATED this 8th day of January, 2009.
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
