Jordan v. Chapnick et al

Filing 106

AMENDMENT TO SECOND SCHEDULING ORDER re 95 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/23/2011. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7

JAMES JORDAN,

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-0202-MJS (PC)

8
Plaintiff,
9
v.

10

AMENDMENT TO SECOND SCHEDULING
ORDER

11
R. CHAPNICK, et al.

(ECF No. 95)

12
Defendants.

13

/
14
15

Plaintiff James Jordan (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and

16

in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated

17

this action on February 7, 2007. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) It proceeds against Defendant

18

Chapnick on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim for inadequate medical care at Pleasant

19

Valley State Prison in 2005. (Id.) The matter has been referred to a United States

20

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

21

Following a partial grant of a Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos.

22

83 & 84), this Court issued a Second Scheduling Order establishing various pre-trial

23

procedures and dates and ordering that trial shall commence March 29, 2011. (ECF No.

24

95.)

25

Given the pendency of Defendant Chapnick’s motion to withdraw admissions (ECF

26

No. 97), the Court deems it prudent to delay the filing of pretrial statements. Accordingly,

27

by this Order, the Court hereby amends the Second Scheduling Order (ECF No.95) as

28

follows:
-1-

1.

1

2012; and

2
2.

3

Defendant shall serve and file a pretrial statement on or before March 1,
2012.

4

All other dates and provisions of the Second Scheduling Order remain as previously

5
6

Plaintiff shall serve and file a pretrial statement on or before February 1,

stated. (ECF No. 95.)

7
8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11

Dated:
ci4d6

December 23, 2011

Michael J. Seng

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-