Bruce v. Woodford, et al.

Filing 136

ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Ex Parte 135 Application to Take Plaintiff's Deposition After the Discovery Cut-Off Date signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/25/2013. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VINCENT C. BRUCE, Case No. 1:07-CV-0269 AWI BAM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO TAKE PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION AFTER THE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE (ECF No. 135) 13 v. 14 15 16 JEANNE WOODFORD, ET AL., Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Vincent C. Bruce is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s claims 20 for relief against: (1) Defendants Adams, Hense, Ward, Clark, Fulks, Wan, Frauenheim, Lloren, 21 Fields and Tripp for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment; (2) Defendants Adams, 22 Hense, Ward, Clark, Fulks, Wan, Lloren, Fields and Tripp for violation of the Due Process 23 Clause; and (3) Defendants Adams, Schottgen and Fields for failing to provide Plaintiff with 24 adequate clothing in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Currently before the Court is 25 Defendants’ Ex Parte Application to Take Plaintiff’s Deposition after the Discovery Cut-off Date. 26 For good cause shown, the Court grants the Application. 27 28 According to the moving papers, this action was reassigned to defense counsel on May 31, 2013. Following reassignment, defense counsel has been attempting to schedule Plaintiff’s 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 deposition in according with the Scheduling Order, which requires 14 days’ notice before the deposition and sets the discovery deadline as July 1, 2013. Defense counsel explains that despite efforts to make arrangements with the Litigation Coordinator at Pelican Bay State Prison, where Plaintiff is house, the required prison facilities and staff will not be available for Plaintiff’s deposition until after the current discovery deadline of July 1, 2013. Defendants intend to arrange for Plaintiff’s deposition as soon as possible after the discovery cut-off date. For good cause shown, Defendants’ application to take Plaintiff’s deposition after the discovery cut-off date is GRANTED. Defendants shall take Plaintiff’s deposition as soon as the deposition can reasonably be scheduled after the current discovery cut-off date of July 1, 2013. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 Dated: /s/ Barbara June 25, 2013 13 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?