Bruce v. Woodford, et al.
Filing
136
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Ex Parte 135 Application to Take Plaintiff's Deposition After the Discovery Cut-Off Date signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/25/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
VINCENT C. BRUCE,
Case No. 1:07-CV-0269 AWI BAM
12
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX
PARTE APPLICATION TO TAKE
PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION AFTER
THE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE
(ECF No. 135)
13
v.
14
15
16
JEANNE WOODFORD, ET AL.,
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff Vincent C. Bruce is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this
19
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s claims
20
for relief against: (1) Defendants Adams, Hense, Ward, Clark, Fulks, Wan, Frauenheim, Lloren,
21
Fields and Tripp for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment; (2) Defendants Adams,
22
Hense, Ward, Clark, Fulks, Wan, Lloren, Fields and Tripp for violation of the Due Process
23
Clause; and (3) Defendants Adams, Schottgen and Fields for failing to provide Plaintiff with
24
adequate clothing in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Currently before the Court is
25
Defendants’ Ex Parte Application to Take Plaintiff’s Deposition after the Discovery Cut-off Date.
26
For good cause shown, the Court grants the Application.
27
28
According to the moving papers, this action was reassigned to defense counsel on May 31,
2013. Following reassignment, defense counsel has been attempting to schedule Plaintiff’s
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
deposition in according with the Scheduling Order, which requires 14 days’ notice before the
deposition and sets the discovery deadline as July 1, 2013. Defense counsel explains that despite
efforts to make arrangements with the Litigation Coordinator at Pelican Bay State Prison, where
Plaintiff is house, the required prison facilities and staff will not be available for Plaintiff’s
deposition until after the current discovery deadline of July 1, 2013. Defendants intend to arrange
for Plaintiff’s deposition as soon as possible after the discovery cut-off date.
For good cause shown, Defendants’ application to take Plaintiff’s deposition after the
discovery cut-off date is GRANTED. Defendants shall take Plaintiff’s deposition as soon as the
deposition can reasonably be scheduled after the current discovery cut-off date of July 1, 2013.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
June 25, 2013
13
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?