Bruce v. Woodford, et al.
Filing
144
ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to File a Response or Statement of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's 143 Request to Extend the Remaining Deadlines an Additional Sixty Days; Twenty-One Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/7/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
VINCENT C. BRUCE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:07-cv-00269-BAM PC
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A
RESPONSE OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO
EXTEND THE REMAINING DEADLINES AN
ADDITIONAL SIXTY DAYS (ECF NO. 143)
TWENTY-ONE-DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Vincent C. Bruce (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
18
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 3, 2013, Plaintiff filed
19
a motion requesting a 60-day extension of time to complete discovery in this matter. (ECF No. 143.)
20
Defendants have not filed a response to the motion. Accordingly, Defendants are directed to file a
21
response or a statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s motion requesting a 60-day extension of time
22
to complete discovery within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
October 7, 2013
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?