Bruce v. Woodford, et al.

Filing 186

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 01/12/2015. (21-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VINCENT C. BRUCE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 v. JEANNE WOODFORD, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:07-cv-00269-BAM PC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE OR DEFENDANTS= MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED FOR PLAINTIFF=S FAILURE TO FILE OPPOSITION TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE Plaintiff Vincent C. Bruce (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s 20 claims against (1) Defendants Adams, Hense, Ward, Clark, Fulks, Wan, Frauenheim, Lloren, Fields 21 and Tripp for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment; (2) Defendants Adams, Hense, Ward, 22 Clark, Fulks, Wan, Lloren, Fields and Tripp for violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth 23 Amendment; and (3) Defendants Adams, Schottgen and Fields for failing to provide Plaintiff with 24 adequate clothing in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 25 On March 17, 2014, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has been 26 granted several extensions of time to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. Most 27 recently, on December 3, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiff a thirty day extension of time to file a 28 response to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 184.) Plaintiff’s response was due 1 1 on or before January 5, 2015. Plaintiff has failed to file a timely opposition or a statement of non- 2 opposition to the motion for summary judgment. 3 Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any he has, why this action should 4 not be dismissed for failure to prosecute or why summary judgment should not be granted in favor of 5 Defendants. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a written response to this Order to Show Cause within 6 twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff may comply with this order by filing his 7 opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion for summary judgment. 8 9 10 Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause may result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute or in summary judgment in favor of Defendants due to Plaintiff’s failure to identify a genuine dispute as to any material fact. 11 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara January 12, 2015 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?