Bruce v. Woodford, et al.
Filing
226
ORDER to Recaption Case signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/26/2016. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
VINCENT C. BRUCE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
) Case No.: 1:07-cv-00269-BAM PC
)
) ORDER TO RECAPTION CASE
)
) (ECF No. 212)
)
)
)
)
)
17
Currently this action proceeds only against Defendants Adams, Hense, Ward, Clark, Fulks,
18
Wan, Frauenheim (erroneously sued as “Fravenheim”), Lloren, Fields, Tripp and Schottgen
19
(erroneously sued as “Schottegen”). Therefore, the caption should reflect the correct names of the
20
parties, and that this action no longer proceeds against Defendants Woodford and Sanchez.
21
Accordingly, the caption for this case shall be as follows:
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
VINCENT C. BRUCE,
2
Plaintiff,
3
4
v.
DERRAL G. ADAMS, et al.,
5
Defendants.
6
) Case No.: 1:07-cv-00269-BAM (PC)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
March 16, 2016
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?