Bruce v. Woodford, et al.

Filing 40

ORDER VACATING 39 Order Directing Plaintiff to Submit Service Documents and Further Ordering Plaintiff to File a Response to the Motion to Dismiss Within Twenty (20) Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/16/2009. Response to Motion to Dismiss due by 10/9/2009. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. On September 9, 2009, this Court issued an order granting Plaintiff's request for service by the United States Marshal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). (Doc. 39.) However, on September 4, 2009, defendants Adams, Clark, Frauenheim, Hense, Lloren, Schottgen, Tripp and Wan ("defendants") filed a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. In light of the fact that defendants have appeared in this action, the Court HEREBY VACATES its order granting service of the summons and complaint by the United States Marshal. Plaintiff is ordered to file a response to the motion to dismiss within twenty (20) days of service of this order. Failure to file a response may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a v. JEANNE WOODFORD, et al., Defendants. / VINCENT C. BRUCE, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00269 AWI DLB PC ORDER VACATING PREVIOUS ORDER (Docs. 39) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT September 16, 2009 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?