Lacy v. Tyson et al

Filing 81

ORDER DISCHARGING 74 Order to Show Cause; ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff (30) Thirty Days to File Rule 25 Motion, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/05/2011. **(30) Day Deadline** (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

GARY ANDRE LACY,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
H. TYSON, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
____________________________________)

1:07-cv-00381-LJO-GSA-PC
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE
(Doc. 74.)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
THIRTY DAYS TO FILE RULE 25
MOTION

17

Gary Andre Lacy ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with

18

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action now proceeds on the Second Amended

19

Complaint, filed on April 28, 2009, against defendants Correctional Officers R. Reyna, T. Reyna, and

20

N. Correa; Correctional Sergeants J. Peacock, M. Bremnar, and M. Brookwalter; Captain H. Tyson;

21

Medical Technician Assistant (MTA) Aspetitia; and Doctor I. Patel; on Plaintiff's claims for excessive

22

force, retaliation, and deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.1

23

On March 31, 2011, the Marshals Service notified the Court that they were unable to serve

24

process on defendant R. Reyna because the defendant is deceased. (Doc. 67.) On September 7, 2011,

25

the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause why defendant R. Reyna should not be

26
1

27

Defendants Dill and Heanacho were dismissed by the Court on August 27, 2009. (Doc. 17.) Plaintiff's claims for
equal protection, and for retaliation against defendant Dill, were also dismissed by the Court, for failure to state a claim. Id.

28

1

1

dismissed from this action based on failure to serve process. (Doc. 74.) On October 3, 2011, Plaintiff

2

filed a response to the order, objecting to the dismissal of defendant R. Reyna and requesting thirty days

3

in which to file and serve a Rule 25 motion substituting defendant R. Reyna's estate as defendant. (Doc.

4

80.)

5
6
7

Good cause appearing, Plaintiff shall be granted thirty days to file a Rule 25 motion. Rule
25(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides:

11

If a party dies and the claim is not thereby extinguished, the court may order substitution
of the proper parties. The motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the
successors or representatives of the deceased party and, together with the notice of
hearing, shall be served on the parties as provided in Rule 5 and upon persons not parties
in the manner provided in Rule 4 for the service of a summons, and may be served in any
judicial district. Unless the motion for substitution is made not later than 90 days after
the death is suggested upon the record by service of statement of the fact of the death as
provided for herein for the service of the motion, the action shall be dismissed as to the
deceased party.

12

Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). Under Rule 25(a)(1), any party may file a motion for substitution, which must

13

be served on all parties as provided in Rule 5 and upon persons not parties in the manner provided in

14

Rule 4 for the service of a summons. Thus, parties may be served by service on their attorney, Fed. R.

15

Civ. P. 5(b), but non-party successors or representatives of the deceased party must be served in the

16

manner provided by Rule 4 for the service of a summons. See Barlow v. Ground, 39 F.3d 231, 232-234

17

(9th Cir. 1994).

8
9
10

18

To proceed with a motion for substitution, Plaintiff must provide proof of service of the motion

19

for substitution upon the other parties to this action and the successors or representatives of R. Reyna,

20

as required by Rule 25(a)(1). Plaintiff requests assistance by the Legal Affairs Division of the California

21

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ("CDCR") and the United States Marshal in identifying

22

and serving the successors or representatives of defendant R. Reyna's estate. However, such assistance

23

is not a function of the Legal Affairs Division of the CDCR or the United States Marshals Service, and

24

it is Plaintiff's responsibility to identify and locate R. Reyna's heirs or representatives. Plaintiff is also

25

responsible to arrange for service of the motion for substitution. Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status does

26

not entitle him to assistance free of charge by the United States Marshal for service of the motion for

27

substitution.

28

2

1

Plaintiff shall be granted thirty days in which to file and serve a Rule 25 motion pursuant to this

2

order. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of defendant R. Reyna from this action without further

3

notice.

4

III.

CONCLUSION

5

Accordingly, based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

6

1.

The Court's order to show cause, entered on September 9, 2011, is DISCHARGED;

7

2.

Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file and

8

serve a Rule 25 motion; and

9

3.

10

Plaintiff's failure to file a Rule 25 motion pursuant to this order will result in the
dismissal of defendant R. Reyna from this action without further notice.

11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13

Dated:
6i0kij

October 5, 2011

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3