Abarca, et. al. vs. Merck & Co., et.al.

Filing 646

STIPULATION and ORDER Thereon Deeming Answers to 8th Amended Complaint the Same as Answers to the 7th Amended Complaint, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 4/9/10. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP JOSEPH A. SALAZAR, JR., SB# 169551 E-Mail: jsalazar@lbbslaw.com 2850 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 450 Sacramento, California 95833 Telephone: (916) 564-5400 Facsimile: (916) 564-5444 Attorneys for FRANKLIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO ABARCA, et. al. , Plaintiff, v. MERCK & CO., et. al., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:07-CV-00388-OWW-DLB STIPULATION AND ORDER THEREON DEEMING ANSWERS TO 8TH AMENDED COMPLAINT THE SAME AS ANSWERS TO THE 7TH AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs' have filed an Eighth Amended Complaint wherein the amended sections to the complaint do not pertain to FRANKLIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT, MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT #1, CITY OF MERCED or COUNTY OF MERCED (herein collectively referred to as "public entity defendants"). It is hereby stipulated by and between defendants, FRANKLIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT, MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT #1, CITY OF MERCED and COUNTY OF MERCED and plaintiffs, through their respective counsel, that the public entity defendants' Answers to the Seventh Amended Complaint will remain the same and applicable to the Eighth Amended Complaint with no need by public entity defendants to file separate Answers to the Eighth Amended Complaint. /// /// 4827-2349-1077.1 LEW I S B R IS B O IS 28 -1- STIPULATION DEEMING ANSW E R S TO 8 TH AMENDED COMPLAINT SAME AS ANSW E R S TO 7 TH A M E N D E D COMPLAINT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 DATED: April 8, 2010 JOSEPH A. SALAZAR, JR. LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP /s/ Joseph A. Salazar, Jr. By Joseph A. Salazar, Jr. Attorney for FRANKLIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT DATED: April 8, 2010 JEFFREY F. ONEAL LAMORE, BRAZIER, RIDDLE & GIAMPAOLI /s/ Jeffrey F. Oneal By___________________________________________ Jeffrey F. Oneal Attorney for MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT and MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT #1 DATED: April 8, 2010 GENE TANAKA BEST, BEST & BRIEGER /s/ Gene Tanaka By__________________________________________ Gene Tanaka Attorney for CITY OF MERCED DATED: April 8, 2010 TERRY L. ALLEN ALLEN, PROIETTI & FAGALDE /s/ Terry L. Allen By____________________________________________ Terry L. Allen Attorney for County of Merced /// /// /// /// /// 4827-2349-1077.1 LEW I S B R IS B O IS 28 -2- STIPULATION DEEMING ANSW E R S TO 8 TH AMENDED COMPLAINT SAME AS ANSW E R S TO 7 TH A M E N D E D COMPLAINT 1 2 3 DATED: April 8, 2010 MICHAEL G. MARDEROSIAN MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE, LEHMAN & ARMO /s/ Michael G. Marderosian 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 9, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER By___________________________________________ Michael G. Marderosian Attorney for Plaintiffs LEW I S B R IS B O IS 28 4827-2349-1077.1 -3- STIPULATION DEEMING ANSW E R S TO 8 TH AMENDED COMPLAINT SAME AS ANSW E R S TO 7 TH A M E N D E D COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?