Wright v. Clark et al

Filing 128

ORDER GRANTING 125 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/11/2012. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

RAYMOND WRIGHT,

10
11
12

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00462-AWI-BAM PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY
TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.
SCOTT KEBNAN, et al.,

(ECF No. 125)
13

Defendants.
/

14
15

Plaintiff Raymond Wright (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

16

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 20, 2012, Defendants

17

filed a motion for an extension of time to file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion for

18

summary judgment. Good cause showing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for

19

an extension of time is GRANTED NUNC PRO TUNC to November 20, 2012, and Defendants’

20

reply filed December 3, 2012, is deemed timely.

21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411

December 11, 2012

/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
1