Wright v. Clark et al
Filing
52
ORDER denying 40 Motion FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/8/2009. (Lundstrom, T)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 October 8, 2009 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff has filed a motion for the entry of default. Plaintiff does not identify any individual defendant by name, nor does Plaintiff make any showing that any of the named defendants have been properly served and have failed to respond. Further on August 17, 2009, JAMES NESMITH, et al., Defendants. vs. RAYMOND WRIGHT, Plaintiff, 1: 07 CV 00462 AWI YNP SMS (PC) ORDER RE MOTION (DOC 40) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Defendants Nesmith, Lefler, Figueroa, Gonzalez, Hernandez, Rivera, Lima, Person, Pearce, Baires, Grannic, Orozco, Miller and Kernan appeared by the filing of a motion to dismiss. The Court therefore declines to direct the Clerk's entry of default. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for the entry of default is
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
