Wright v. Clark et al

Filing 56

ORDER that Defendants Baires, Figueroa, Gonzalez, Grannis, Hernandez, Kernan, Lefler, Lima, Miller, Nesmith, Orozco, Pearce, Peterson and Rivera shall, within thirty days of the date of service of this order, file a further response to the March 27, 2008, 23 first amended complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 02/10/2010. Response to Complaint due by 3/16/2010.(Flores, E)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 On February 9, 2010, an order was entered by the District Court, adopting the October 29, 2009, findings and recommendations that the motion to dismiss by Defendants Baires, Figueroa, Gonzalez, Grannis, Hernandez, Kernan, Lefler, Lima, Miller, Nesmith, Orozco, Pearce, Peterson and Rivera be denied. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Baires, Figueroa, Gonzalez, Grannis, Hernandez, Kernan, Lefler, Lima, Miller, Nesmith, Orozco, Pearce, Peterson and Rivera shall, within thirty days of the date of service of this order, file a further response to the March 27, 2008, first amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 February 10, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEN CLARK, et al., Defendants. vs. RAYMOND WRIGHT, Plaintiff, 1: 07 CV 00462 AWI YNP SMS (PC) ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA