Wright v. Clark et al

Filing 69

ORDER ADOPTING 66 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER DENYING 58 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/22/2010. (Jessen, A)

(PC) Wright v. Clark et al

Doc. 69

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Raymond Wright ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 7, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendations which recommended that Defendants' motion to dismiss be denied. (Doc. #66.) The Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date on which the Findings and Recommendations were served. Recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. /// /// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

RAYMOND WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v.

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00462-AWI-SKO PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

KEN CLARK, et al., (Documents #58 & #66) Defendants. /

Neither party has filed objections to the Findings and

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. 2. The June 7, 2010 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full; and Defendant's February 23, 2010 motion to dismiss is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 August 22, 2010 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2