Wright v. Clark et al

Filing 93

ORDER STRIKING 92 Plaintiff's Reply filed by Raymond Wright from the record, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/15/2011. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

RAYMOND WRIGHT,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00462-AWI-SMS PC
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S REPLY

v.

(ECF No. 92)

SCOTT KEBNAN, et al.,

13

Defendants.
/

14
15

Plaintiff Raymond Wright (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

16

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on the

17

first amended complaint, filed March 27, 2008, against Defendants Lefler, Figueroa, Gonzalez,

18

Hernandez and Rivera for interference with Plaintiff’s right of access to the courts; Defendants

19

Lefler, Gonzalez, Rivera, Desbit, Lima, Peterson, Pearce, Baires, Pennington, Grannis, and Kernan

20

for retaliation; and Defendants Lefler, Orozco and Miller for violations of the Equal Protection

21

Clause. On June 16, 2011, Defendant Pennington filed an answer to the amended complaint and

22

Plaintiff filed a reply on August 11, 2011.

23

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide, in relevant part, that there shall be a

24

complaint, an answer, and a reply to an answer if the court orders one. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a). The

25

Court has not ordered a reply to the answer and declines to make such an order. Therefore Plaintiff’s

26

reply shall be stricken from the record.

27

///

28

///
1

1
2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s reply, filed August 11, 2011, is
STRICKEN from the record.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

Dated:
icido3

August 15, 2011

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2