Barry Lamon v. Tilton, et al

Filing 85

ORDER Setting Discovery and Scheduling Deadlines for Defendants Vikjord, Aspieda, Vanzant, and Elize signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/2/2009. (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Barry Louis Lamon ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against defendants Luna, Price, Wilber, Vikjord, Aspieda, Magvass, Vanzant, Hamilton, Cortez, Frescura, Elize, Alvarez, and Hernandez for violation of the First and Eighth Amendment. (Docs. 65, 68.) On October 26, 2009, defendants Price, Wilber, Magvass, Hamilton, Cortez, Frescura, Alvarez, and Hernandez filed their answer to Plaintiff's third amended complaint. (Doc. 75.) The Court issued a discovery and scheduling order for these defendants on October 30, 2009. (Doc. 76.) On December 1, 2009, Defendants Luna, Vikjord, Aspieda, Vanzant, and Elize filed their answer to Plaintiff's third amended complaint. (Doc. 83.) Because these latter Defendants filed their answer within 1 month of the issuance of the Court's discovery and scheduling order, the Court will apply the same discovery and scheduling 1 v. TILTON, et al., Defendants. / BARRY LOUIS LAMON, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00493-AWI-DLB (PC) ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING DEADLINES FOR DEFENDANTS VIKJORD, ASPIEDA, VANZANT, AND ELIZE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 deadlines previously issued. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's Discovery and Scheduling Order, filed on October 30, 2009, applies to Defendants Luna, Vikjord, Aspieda, Vanzant, and Elize. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a December 2, 2009 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?