Palmer v. Crotty et al

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 23 signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/17/2009. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice as duplicative. CASE CLOSED.(Esteves, C)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 C/O CROTTY, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter 16 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 17 Rule 72-302. 18 On January 12, 2009, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending 19 dismissal of this action as duplicative. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections 20 within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 21 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 22 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 23 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 24 proper analysis. 25 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 26 1 vs. ORDER RE: FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS (#23) STEVEN M. PALMER, Plaintiff, 1: 07 CV 0514 LJO WMW PC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on January 12, 2009, are adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice as duplicative. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

February 17, 2009

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2